CFOtech Australia - Technology news for CFOs & financial decision-makers
Rima

Breaking barriers to women's tech careers by rethinking pathways

Fri, 6th Mar 2026

The gender gap in technology is a critical diversity challenge, but it is also a $6.5 billion commercial opportunity Australian businesses can no longer afford to overlook. We are projected to need an additional 230,000 technology workers by 2030. Yet, the tech workforce growth over the past 12 months has been more subdued than in previous years.  

A weak growth in the workforce, combined with businesses being held back by the shortage of skilled candidates, means one thing: we can no longer afford to gatekeep the sector behind rigid, linear career models.  

Addressing this imbalance is as much about social equity as it is about national productivity. It requires us to rethink the pathways into tech, moving toward a system that values individuals for their potential and ability to learn, and not just their existing technical qualifications. 

A high-stakes commercial imperative 

The commercial dividend of this shift is undeniable, yet it is inextricably linked to our progress on diversity. Beyond the personal impact for women, who can see an average annual salary boost of $31,100 by transitioning into tech, the benefits to the bottom line are profound. Business leaders who prioritise diversity report improved team performance, heightened creativity, and a measurable lift in innovation.  

For large companies, attracting more women into these roles can deliver a dividend of $1.8 million per year. Yet, we can't expect to claim this dividend if we don't first address the expertise gap in generative AI and digital transformation still plaguing a third of Australian businesses. 

The skills gap paradox 

While women comprise just under half of Australia's workforce, they hold just 30% of all tech roles. The current talent shortage in tech is not a result of a lack of interest among women. Broader barriers to entry, including having the necessary skills plus the recognition of them, are both contributing factors. 

These are women with established professional backgrounds, strategic minds, and deep industry knowledge who are currently skill-locked because the traditional entry points remain too narrow. Our research suggests 661,300 women in Australia could reskill into tech roles within six months through targeted upskilling. Given the financial impact of upskilling women into the tech sector, businesses should work to break down these barriers. 

Designing for the non-linear career 

For a mid-career professional, the decision to pivot into technology is rarely about a lack of ambition. It is often a calculation of time and accessibility. Women, who still bear the disproportionate load of caregiving and community responsibilities, frequently find the traditional path to a new career is impractical. A parent returning from leave or a professional balancing a household can't always commit to a multi-year degree to gain the digital fluency the market demands today. 

This is where non-linear pathways become essential equity levers. Microcredentials, industry-led training, and hands-on upskilling are just some model examples allowing women to bridge the gap between their existing experience and the technical currency required to thrive in a digital-first economy without hitting pause on their lives. 

Modernising the definition of talent 

To move from awareness to action, technology decision-makers must modernise their definition of talent. This begins with a commitment to skills-first hiring, focusing on verified competencies and portfolios, and reflecting upskilling opportunities rather than relying solely on historical credentials. It requires the implementation of inclusive hiring processes designed to minimise unconscious bias and a structural investment in flexible learning. 

By supporting mid-career transitions and offering reskilling opportunities that accommodate external responsibilities, we ensure our workforce remains as resilient as it is diverse. If we remain stagnant, the consequences for our already low national productivity will be significant.  

By investing in agile, industry-aligned learning alongside our vital traditional foundations, we do more than fill vacancies. We ensure the Australian tech sector is as commercially sharp as it is representative of the society it serves.