Laina Chan explores how legal practice intersects with emerging technology, with a particular focus on the limits and risks of current legal AI tools. Her writing examines not just what generative systems can produce, but how their inner workings clash with the demands of rigorous, source-backed legal reasoning.

Through careful critique of persuasive but unreliable AI-generated analysis, Chan highlights why common law research must remain anchored in transparent citation, precise treatment of precedent, and verifiable logic. Readers interested in the future of legal work, responsible use of AI in law, and the preservation of doctrinal integrity will find her insights both cautionary and practical.